Harvesting asparagus: Comparative effects on yield of cutting and of snapping studied
Author
G. C. HannaAuthor Affiliations
G. C. Hanna is Lecturer in Truck Crops and Associate Olericulturist in the Experiment Station, Davis.Publication Information
Hilgardia 4(5):13-14. DOI:10.3733/ca.v004n05p13. May 1950.
PDF of full article, Cite this article
Abstract
Under California conditions it is doubful whether a saving of labor by field snapping would offset the decrease in yield in the field, and the loss of usable asparagus by trimming in the cannery.
Hanna G. 1950. Harvesting asparagus: Comparative effects on yield of cutting and of snapping studied. Hilgardia 4(5):13-14. DOI:10.3733/ca.v004n05p13
Also in this issue:
Lamb consumption: Varies according to population group and to size of family annual incomeDairy industry, 1949: Progress report of research conducted by members of the staff of the Division of Dairy Industry at Davis
Fruit size and leaf composition: Concentration of potassium in orange leaves found to be associated with fruit sizes
New sugar beet pest: 100% control of sugar beet crown borer achieved in 1949 tests
Wax sprays for sweet cherries: Fail to increase size of fruit in experimental tests in Davis in 1946 and in San Joaquin County in 1949
Walnut aphid control: Aphicide in May codling moth spray effective in northern California
Alfalfa caterpillar control: Treatment of fields by airplane application of spray advances destruction of pest
Cantaloupe mosaic insect vectors of virus disease resist insecticides in field tests
Tomato spacing: Close spacing increased early yields in 1946–1949 experiments
Tomato insect studies: DDD and DDT in three-year tests with chlorinated hydrocarbons
Housing lumber: Depends upon family income, cost of ownership, population growth
The medullated wool fiber