Hilgardia
Hilgardia
Hilgardia
University of California
Hilgardia

Some carbohydrate and nitrogen constituents of alternate-bearing sugar prunes associated with fruit bud formation

Author

Luther D. Davis

Author Affiliations

Luther D. Davis was Assistant Professor of Pomology and Assistant Pomologist in the Experiment Station.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 5(6):119-154. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v05n06p119. January 1931.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Abstract does not appear. First page follows.

Introduction

The horticulturist uses the term “alternate-bearing habit” to designate the tendency of certain fruit trees to produce a heavy crop in one year, followed the next year, by a much lighter crop. Although this condition of alternate bearing is perhaps more marked in some varieties of apples than in other fruits, a tendency toward alternate bearing does exist in fruits other than the apple, and the degree of the alternating habit may be determined by the degree to which a given internal condition exists.

Practically all of the investigations concerned with alternate bearing have been made with apple trees. Although a number of conditions have been described to account for this habit in the apple, very little work has been done with other fruits which have a pronounced alternating habit. The Sugar prune, under the conditions existing at Davis, California, is a very pronounced biennial bearer. Yield records and observations at blcoming time show that a tree which produces a heavy crop in one year will produce almost no crop the following year—possibly only a dozen or so blossoms. The climatic conditions at Davis are such that they rarely interfere with the normal bearing habit. The Sugar prune (P. domestica), under these conditions, would seem to be an especially fit subject for the investigation of any chemical differences which might be associated with the alternate-bearing habit and fruit-bud formation.

Literature Cited

[1] Aldermann W. H. The fertilization of peach orchards. West Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1915. 150:1-40.

[2] Anderson A. G., Hooker H. D. Soil treatments and seasonal chemical changes in the sour cherry. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1927. 108:1-27.

[3] Auchter E. C. Five years investigations in apple thinning. West Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1917. 162:1-56.

[4] Ball E. The time of differentiation and the subsequent development of the blossom bud of the plum. Jour. Pomology and Hort. Science. 1927. 6:198-208.

[5] Beach S. A. Thinning apples. New York (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1903. 239:197-224.

[6] Bushnell John. The relation of temperature to growth and respiration in the potato plant. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1925. 34:1-29. DOI: 10.1007/BF02910567 [CrossRef]

[7] Butler O. R., Smith T. O., Curry B. E. Physiology of the apple Distribution of food materials in the tree at different periods of vegetation. New Hampshire Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1917. 13:1-21.

[8] Cameron S. H. Doctor’s thesis 1927. University of California. (Unpublished.)

[9] Chandler W. H. Fruit growing. 1925. New York: Houghton-Mifflin Company. p. 222-223.

[10] Collins I. D. Quantitative hydrolysis of starch by buffered taka-diastase Sci. 1927. 66 430p. DOI: 10.1126/science.66.1714.430 [CrossRef]

[11] Crow J. W., Eidt C. C. The relation of certain orchard practices to fruit bud formation. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1921. 18:104-108.

[12] Davis A. R. Unpublished data 1928 Division of Plant Nutrition, University of California

[13] Drinkard A. W. Jr. Some effects of pruning, root pruning, ringing, and stripping on the formation of fruit buds on dwarf apple trees. Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1915. 5:96-120.

[14] Drinkard A. W. Jr. Fruit bud formation and development. Ann. Report Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. 1909-1910. 1909-1910:159-205.

[15] Drinkard A. W. Jr. Effects of soil environment on fruit bud formation. Ann. Report Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. 1918. 1916-1917:11-16.

[16] Fischer Hugo. Über die Blütenbildung in ihrer Abhändigkeit vom Licht und über die Blütenbildenden Substanzen. Flora. 1905. 94:478-490.

[17] Goff E. S. The origin and early development of flowers in the cherry, plum, apple, pear. Sixteenth Ann. Report Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. 1899. 1899:289-303.

[18] Gourley J. H. Studies in fruit-bud formation. New Hampshire Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1915. 9:1-80.

[19] Hartig R. Anatomie und Physiologie der Pflanzen. 1891. p. 251-253. Berlin DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.12962 [CrossRef]

[20] Harvey E. M., Murneek A. E. The relation of carbohydrates and nitrogen to the behavior of apple spurs. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1921. 176:1-47.

[21] Hooker H. D. Seasonal changes in the chemical composition of apple spurs. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1920. 40:1-52.

[22] Hooker H. D., Bradford F. C. Localization of the factors determining fruit bud formation. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1921. 47:1-19.

[23] Howlett F. S. The nitrogen and carbohydrate composition of the developing flowers and young fruits of the apple. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Memoir. 1926. 99:1-80.

[24] Kraus E. J., Kraybill H. R. Vegetation and reproduction with special reference to the tomato. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1918. 149:1-90. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.36802 [CrossRef]

[25] Kraybill H. R., Potter G. F., et al. Some chemical constituents of fruit spurs associated with blossom bud formation in the Baldwin apple. New Hampshire Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1925. 29:1-41. I-XIII

[26] Kraybill H. R. Effect of shading and ringing upon the chemical composition of apple and peach trees. New Hampshire Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1923. 23:1-27.

[27] Link K. P. Effects of the method of dessication on the carbohydrates of plant tissues. Jour. Am. Chem. Soc. 1925. 47:470-476.

[28] Loew Oskar. Zur Theorie der Blütenbildenden Stoffe. Flora. 1905. 94:124-128.

[29] Magness J. R. Studies in fruit bud formation. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1917. 146:1-27.

[30] Mitra S. K. Seasonal changes and translocation of carbohydrate materials in fruit spurs and two-year-old seedlings of apples. Ohio Jour. Sci. 1921. 21:89-103.

[31] Murneek A. E. Is fruiting of the apple an exhaustive process?. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1925. 22: p. 196-200.

[32] Murneek A. E. Effects of correlation between vegetative and reproductive functions in the tomato. Plant Physiology. 1926. 1:3-56. DOI: 10.1104/pp.1.1.3 [CrossRef]

[33] Murneek A. E. Physiology of reproduction in horticultural plants. I. Reproduction and metabolic efficiency in the tomato. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1926. 90:1-19.

[34] Murneek A. E. Nitrogen and carbohydrate distribution in organs of bearing apple spurs. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1928. 119:1-50.

[35] Nightingale G. T. The chemical composition of plants in relation to photo-periodic changes. Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1927. 74:1-68.

[36] Roberts R. H. Nitrogen reserve in apple trees. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1921. 18:143-145.

[37] Roberts R. H. Apple physiology: growth, composition and fruiting responses in apple trees. Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1926. 68:1-72.

[38] Roberts R. H. Effect of defoliation upon blossom bud formation. Wisconsin Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1923. 56:1-15.

[39] Remy T. The application of nitrogen in relation to fruit bud formation. Agr. Exp. Sta. Record. 1913. 29:539

[40] Shaffer P. A., Hartmann A. F. The iodometric determination and its use in sugar analysis. Jour. Biol. Chem. 1920. 45:349-390.

[41] Shaw J. K. An experiment in ringing apple trees. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1923. 19:216-220.

[42] Summers F. The factors governing bud formation; a chapter of plant physiology. New Phytologist. 1924. 23:20-49. 78-102, 113-121 DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1924.tb06625.x [CrossRef]

[43] Swarbrick Thomas. Factors governing fruit bud formation. VIII. The seasonal elongation growth of apple varieties on some vegetative root stocks; and its possible relation to fruit bud formation. Jour. Pomology and Hort. Sci. 1928. 7:100

[44] Swarbrick Thomas. Studies in the physiology of fruit trees. I. The seasonal starch content and cambial activity in one to five-year-old apple branches. Jour. Pomology and Hort. Sci. 1928. 6:137-156.

[45] Thomas Walter. Nitrogenous metabolism of Pyrus malus. I. Influence of temperature of dessication on water-soluble nitrogenous constituents and separation of water-soluble protein from non-protein constituents. Plant Physiology. 1927. 2:55-66.

[46] Thomas Walter. The colorimetric determination of carbohydrates in plants by the picric acid reduction method. II. The determination of starch and other “reserve” polysaccharides. Jour. Am. Chem. Soc. 1924. 46:1670-1675.

[47] Thomas Walter, Dutcher R. Adams. The colorimetric determination of carbohydrates in plants by the picric acid reduction method. I. The estimation of reducing sugars and sucrose. Jour. Am. Chem. Soc. 1924. 46:1662-1669.

[48] Tufts W. P., Morrow E. B. Fruit bud differentiation in deciduous fruits. Hilgardia. 1925. 1:1-12. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v01n01p001 [CrossRef]

[49] Wiggans C. C. Some factors favoring or opposing fruitfulness in apples. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul. 1918. 32:1-60.

[50] Willaman J. J., Davison F. R. Some modifications of the picric acid method for sugars. Jour. Agr. Res. 1924. 28:479

Davis L. 1931. Some carbohydrate and nitrogen constituents of alternate-bearing sugar prunes associated with fruit bud formation. Hilgardia 5(6):119-154. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v05n06p119
Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu