A site index system for redwood and Douglas-fir in California’s North Coast Forest
AuthorsLee C. Wensel
Authors AffiliationsLee C. Wensel was Associate Professor in the Department of Forestry and Resource Management, University of California, Berkeley; Bruce Krumland was Associate Specialist in the Department of Forestry and Resource Management, University of California, Berkeley.
Hilgardia 54(8):1-14. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v54n08p017. November 1986.
This article evaluates and compares existing site index equations applicable to redwood and Douglas-fir in California’s north coast redwood forest. The authors find previous site index models for redwood to be biased, particularly in younger age classes. They therefore developed new polymorphic site index equations for this species, using both stem analysis and permanent plot data from Humboldt, Del Norte, and Mendocino counties. The new curves use a 50-year breast-height (4.5-foot) age as a base.
For Douglas-fir, tests showed King’s site index model for Douglas-fir in Washington and Oregon to be unbiased and adequate for Douglas-fir site index estimation in the north coast. Also, for cases in which appropriate site index trees are available for only one species, the authors give equations to predict redwood site index from Douglas-fir site index or to predict Douglas-fir site index from redwood site index.
Assman E. The principles of forest yield study. 1970. New York: Pergamon Press.
Biging Greg S. Improved estimates of site index curves using a varying-parameter model. For. Sci. 1984. 31(1):248-59.
Bruce David. Consistent height-growth and growth rate estimates for remeasured plots. For. Sci. 1981. 27(4):711-25.
Bruce Donald. Preliminary yield tables for second-growth redwoods. Univ. Calif. Agric. Exp. St. Bull. 1923. 361:423-67. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.59159 [CrossRef]
Curtis Robert O. A comparison of site curves for Douglas-fir. U.S. For. Serv. Res. Pap. PNW-37 1966. p.7.
Curtis Robert O., DeMars Donald J., Herman Francis R. Which dependent variable in site index-height-age regressions?. For. Sci. 1974. 20:74-87.
Ford-Robertson F. C. Terminology of forest science, technology, practice, and products. 2d printing. 1983. Washington: Society of American Foresters.
Hagglund B. Evaluation of forest site productivity. For. Abstr. 1981. 42(11):515-27.
Husch Bertran, Miller C. I., Beers T. W. Forest mensuration. 1972. 2d ed. New York: Ronald Press.
Jones J. R. Review and comparison of site evaluation methods. U.S. For. Serv. Res. Pap. RM-51 1969.
King James E. Site index curves for Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. Weyerhaeuser Forestry Paper No. 8. 1966. Centralia, Washington: Weyerhaeuser Forestry Research Center.
Krumland B., Wensel L. C. CRYPTOS/CRYPT2 user’s guide, version 4.0. Redwood Research Note No. 20. 1982. Berkeley: Dept. of Forestry and Resource Management, Univ. Calif. (mimeo)
Lindquist James L., Palley M. N. Site curves for young-growth coastal redwood. Calif. For. For. Prod. 1961. 29:1-4.
McArdle Richard, Meyer Walter H. The yield of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1961. p.201. (revised)
Monserud Robert A. Height growth and site index curves for inland Douglas-fir based on stem analysis data and forest habitat. For. Sci. 1984. 30(4):943-65.
Osborne J. G., Schumacher F. X. The construction of normal yield curves and stand tables for even-aged timber stands. J. Agric. Res. Washington, D.C. 1935. 51:547-63.
Richards F. L. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot. 1959. 10(29):290-300. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/10.2.290 [CrossRef]
Schumacher Francis X. Yield, stand, and volume tables for Douglas fir in California. Univ. Calif. Agric. Exp. St. Bull. 1930. p.491.