Biological and systematic studies of developmental stages in Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): III. Meconia as a possible systematic tool in Aphytis
Authors AffiliationsPaul DeBach was Professor of Biological Control and Entomologist in the Experiment Station, Riverside; Mike Rose was Staff Research Associate at the Division of Biological Control, Riverside; David Rosen was Associate Professor of Entomology at the Hebrew University, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel; during 1975-1976 he was Visiting Professor of Entomology, Riverside.
Hilgardia 46(3):102-112. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v46n03p102. April 1978.
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
This paper is the third in a series of biological and systematic investigations of developmental characteristics in the genus Aphytis Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae).
The systematics of Aphytis has been based almost entirely on imaginal morphology, which often does not show strong interspecific differences. Other than pupal pigmentation, which has proved useful in certain cases (DeBach, 1959), characteristics of developmental stages have not been utilized as systematic tools in this genus. The first paper in this series (Rosen and Eliraz, 1978) presented the developmental history of the generotype of Aphytis, A. chilensis Howard, as a basic background study, and included detailed descriptions of the various developmental stages. The second paper (Eliraz and Rosen, 1978) presented a comparative study of larval characteristics of several species in five species-groups, and the present paper reports the results of a comparative investigation of meconial pellets in several species of Aphytis.
In most parasitic Hymenoptera, fecal material accumulates in the midgut throughout the larval feeding period, and is expelled, in the form of a meconium or meconial pellets, only when the blind midgut becomes linked with the proctodaeum prior to pupation (Hagen, 1964). The meconia of numerous parasitic Hymenoptera have been occasionally described, but have not been used much as a diagnostic character for identification or classification. (Flanders (1942)) briefly discussed the meconia of several species, and concluded that “although larval meconium is of little, if any, value in identifying the species of a genus, it may be of value in the recognition of the species which compose the parasitic fauna of a host in the field.” More recently, Viggiani (1969) has shown that the shape of the meconia may be used to separate certain eulophid parasites of leaf-mining insects.
All the known species of Aphytis are ectoparasites of armored scale insects, developing externally on the bodies of their hosts beneath the covering scale (Rosen and DeBach, 1976). Their distinctive meconial pellets are very conspicuous under the scale, and have been noted by some of the early workers. (Quayle (1910)), for instance, described the meconia of A. chrysomphali (Mercet) [erroneously recorded by him as A. diaspidis (Howard)] as follows:
“Always accompanying the pupa are from six to ten black or dark brown torpedo like bodies .125 mm. long and .055 mm. broad, which are evacuations from the digestive tract and are expelled by the larva preliminary to pupation.”
Similarly, (Taylor (1935)), in his description of (presumably) the same species, wrote:
“No excretion occurs until the larva is ready to pupate. The excrement is in the form of small, shiny, black or brown bodies, bluntly pointed at each end—and usually 5 or 6 in number, and uniform in shape. They are deposited inside the scale, round the posterior end of the larva, and are so conspicuous in Aspidiotus destructor that they are very useful as a means of detecting the full-grown larvae or pupae in situ.”
Carmin J., Scheinkin D. Red scale in Palestine (Hemiptera: Coccidae). Bull. Soc. R. Entomol. Egypte (NS). 1934. 18:242-74. pl. viii
Compere H. A systematic study of the genus Aphytis Howard (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) with descriptions of new species. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 1955. 10:271-319.
DeBach P. New species and strains of Aphytis (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) parasitic on the California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.), in the Orient. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 1959. 52:354-62.
DeBach P. The importance of taxonomy to biological control as illustrated by the cryptic history of Aphytis holoxanthus n. sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasite of Chrysomphalus aonidum, and Aphytis coheni n. sp., a parasite of Aonidiella aurantii. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 1960. 53:701-05.
DeBach P. “Aphytis costa-limai” (Gomes, 1941) comb. n., a parasite of “Chrysomphalus aonidum” (L.) in Brazil (Chalcidoidea, Aphelinidae). Rev. Brasil. Biol. 1963. 23:35-38.
DeBach P., Rosen D., Delucchi V. L. Armored scale insects. Chapter 6. Studies in Biological Control. Internat. Biol. Prog. 1976a. 9:Cambridge Univ. Press. p. 139-78.
DeBach P., Rosen D. Twenty new species of Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) with notes and new combinations. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 1976b. 69:541-45.
Eliraz A., Rosen D. Biological and systematic studies of developmental stages in Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). II. Larval criteria in the systematics of Aphytis. Hilgardia. 1978. 46(2): DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v46n02p037 [CrossRef]
Flanders S. E. The larval meconium of parasitic Hymenoptera as a sign of the species. J. Econ. Entomol. 1942. 35:456-57.
Girault A. A. A systematic monograph of the chalcidoid Hymenoptera of the subfamily Signiphorinae. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 1913. 45:189-233. DOI: 10.5479/si.00963801.1977.189 [CrossRef]
Gulmahamad H., DeBach P. Biological control of the San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus pcrniciosus (Comstock) (Hymenoptera: Diaspididae) in southern California. Hilgardia 1978. in press
Hagen K. S., DeBach P. Developmental stages of parasites. Chapter 7. Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. 1964. London: Chapman and Hall. p. 168-246.
Huffaker C. B., Kennett C. E., Finney G. L. Biological control of olive scale, Parlatoria oleae (Colvée), in California by imported Aphytis maculicornis (Masi) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Hilgardia. 1962. 32:541-636. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v32n13p541 [CrossRef]
Quayle H. J. Aphelinus diaspidis Howard. J. Econ. Entomol. 1910. 3:398-401.
Quednau F. W. A contribution on the genus Aphytis Howard in South Africa. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). J. Entomol. Soc. S. Afr. 1964. 27:86-116.
Quezada J. R., DeBach P., Rosen D. Biological and taxonomic studies of Signiphora borinquensis, new species, (Hymenoptera: Signiphoridae), a primary parasite of diaspine scales. Hilgardia. 1973. 41:543-603. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v41n18p543 [CrossRef]
Rao S. V., DeBach P. Experimental studies on hybridization and sexual isolation between some Aphytis species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). I. Experimental hybridization and an interpretation of evolutionary relationships among the species. Hilgardia. 1969. 39:515-53. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v39n19p515 [CrossRef]
Rosen D., DeBach P. Systematics, morphology and biological control. Entomophaga. 1973. 18:215-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF02371468 [CrossRef]
Rosen D., DeBach P. Biosystematic studies on the species of Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Mushi. 1976. 49:1-17.
Rosen D., DeBach P. Resurrection of Aphytis theae (Cameron), a parasite of tea scale, with notes on a new group of species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Fla. Entomol. 1977. 60(1):1-10. DOI: 10.2307/3494475 [CrossRef]
Rosen D., Eliraz A. Biological and systematic studies of developmental stages in Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). I. Developmental history of Aphytis chilensis Howard. Hilgardia. 1978. 46(2): DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v46n02p037 [CrossRef]
Taylor T. H. C. The campaign against Aspidiotus destructor, Sign., in Fiji. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1935. 26:1-102. DOI: 10.1017/S0007485300024925 [CrossRef]
Traboulsi R. Contribution à l’étude des Aphytis Howard du Liban (Hym. Chalcidoidea, Aphelinidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N.S.). 1969. 5:5-72.
Viggiani G. La specializzazione entomoparassitica in alcuni eulofidi (Hym., Chalcidoidea). Entomophaga. 1964. 9:111-18. DOI: 10.1007/BF02375747 [CrossRef]
Yasnosh V. A. On the biosystematic characteristics of species of the genus Aphytis Howard (Chalcidoidea, Aphelinidae)—parasites of scale insects in the USSR. Entomol. Obozr. 1972. 51:240-53. (in Russian). (English transl.: Entomol. Rev., 51: 146-52.)
Also in this issue:California's Long Drought
Initial research indicates dairy goats used to clear poison oak do not transfer toxicant to milk
Microcomputer program ACRE helps answer: When water is limited, how many acres do you plant?
A greenhouse experiment finds water-sorbing polymers do not conserve water
Two-year study in San Joaquin County indicates sampling procedures to find nepoviruses in grapevines need improvement
To anticipate the future, models simulate US. pistachio prices
In fumigating Verticillium-infested soils, potassium deficiencies in cotton go down, yields go up
In a study of avocado trees, using less fertilizer more often can reduce nitrate leaching
Normal fruit set is up; shotberries are down: Topical application of ‘Sevillano’ pollen to ‘Manzanillo’ olive proves effective
Researchers take a look at the versatile L.: wanton weed and/or golf turf?
By budgeting irrigated pasture growth rates, managers control forage levels and animal performance
Weed seed in dairy manure depends on collection site
Biological and systematic studies of developmental stages in Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): I. Developmental history of Aphytis chilensis Howard
Biological and systematic studies of developmental stages in Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): II. Larval criteria in the systematics of Aphytis