Studies on the origin of the lemon
AuthorsR. W. Scora
R. K. Soost
M. N. Malik
Authors AffiliationsR. W. Scora was Associate Professor of Botany and Associate Botanist in the Experiment Station, Riverside; R. K. Soost was Professor of Genetics and Geneticist in the Experiment Station, Riverside; M. N. Malik was in the Department of Horticulture, West Pakistan Agricultural University, Lyallpur, Pakistan. He was formerly a graduate student of Department of Plant Sciences, Riverside.
Hilgardia 42(9):361-382. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v42n09p361. April 1974.
Hybrids of ‘Eureka’ and ‘Lisbon’ lemons were studied along with their parents and possible ancestral types to investigate the phylogeny of Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f. Data on leaf, flower, and fruit characters were collected and analyzed for inheritance of specific characters and for the amount of variability. Leaf and rind-oil components were analyzed by gas chromatography. Those hybrids producing sufficient microspores were studied for meiotic abnormalities. Segregation of all characters studied demonstrates the heterozygosity of C. limon. Color (anthocyanin) development in flower buds and young leaves is most likely controlled by a single dominant gene. Color on the young stems may be controlled by two dominant genes, one of which also controls color in flower buds and young leaves. Preformed root initials are most likely controlled by one, and leaf articulation by at least two genes.
Characters specific to C. medica were present in the lemon progeny, indicating definite involvement of the citron in the lemon ancestry. Some characters indicate a possible common gene source with C. aurantifolia and C. jambhiri. The deviation of some hybrids from their parents or proposed ancestors indicates a contributing gene source that has not yet been identified.
The presence of much sterility and wide segregation of characters argues against the specific standing of C. limon. It has a common gene source with the citron-lime group, and it may be a derived hybrid involving some unidentified taxa.
The overlapping geographical distribution of various Citrus taxa at the assumed place of origin of C. limon further suggests the possibility of intercrossing or common origin of various Citrus species.
Bhattacharya S. C., Dutta S. Classification of citrus fruits of Assam. Sci. Monogr. No. 20. 1956. New Delhi, India: ICRA.
Bonavia E. The cultivated oranges and lemons, etc. of India and Ceylon. 1888. London: W. H. Allen and Co.
Carpenter J. B. Occurrence and inheritance of preformed root primordia in stems of citron (Citrus medica L.). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1961. 77:211-18.
De Candolle Alphonse. Origin of cultivated plants. 1886. 2nd ed. London: Kegan Paul.
Dipon W. J. Program BMD03M of factor analysis. Biomedical Computer Program. 1967. 2nd ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. California Press.
Gallesio G. Orange culture. A treatise on the citrus family. (Translated from the French expressly for the Florida Agriculturist.). 1876. Jacksonville, Florida: H. Walton &; Co. 65p.
Harman H. H. Modern factor analysis. 1960. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
Haskell G., Wills A. B. Primer of chromosome practice. 1968. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.
Hodgson R. W. Origin of citrus fruits grown in California. Calif. Citrogr. 1955. 49:118 132-36
Hodgson R. W. Taxonomy and nomenclature in citrus. Intern. Org. Citrus Virol. Proc. 1961. 2:1-7.
Kesterson J. W., Pieringer A. P., Edwards G. J., Hendrickson R. Application of gas-liquid chromatography to the citrus leaf oils for the identification of kinds of citrus. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1964. 83:199-203.
Khush G. S., Stebbins G. L. Cytogenetics and evolutionary studies in Secale. I. Some new data on. the ancestry of Secale cereale. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1961. 48:723-30. DOI: 10.2307/2439062 [CrossRef]
Linnaeus Carl. Species Plantarum. Vol. II. Holmiae (Stockholm). 1753. London: Impensis Laurentii Salvii. [Printed for the Ray Society in 1959.]
Lushington A. W. The genus Citrus. Ind. For. 1910. 36:323-53.
Marcovitch B. B. Classification of the genus Citrus. In:. Landbouw, Buitenzorg. 1926. 2(4):1-25.
Michel E. Traité du Citronnier. 1816. Paris: Bertrand.
Pieringer A. P., Edwards C. J., Wolford R. W. The identification of citrus species and varieties by instrumental analysis of citrus leaf oils. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1964. 84:204-12.
Risso J. A. Essai sur l’histoire naturelle des oranges, bigaradiers, limettiers, cédratiers, limoniers ou citroniers, cultivés dans le Départment des Alpes Maritimes. Ann. Mus. Paris. 1813. 20:169-212.
Scora R. W., Duesch G., England A. B. Essential leaf oils in the Rutaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot. 1969. 56:1094-102. DOI: 10.2307/2440934 [CrossRef]
Scora R. W., Malik M. N. Chemical characterization of cultivated plants as a tool in phylogeny. Taxon. 1970. 215:228
Sokal R. R., Sneath P. A. Principles of numerical taxonomy. 1963. San Francisco and London: W. H. Freeman, and Co. 359p. pp.
Swingle W. T., Bailey L. H. Citrus and related genera. Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture. 1914. New York: The Macmillan Co. p. 779-785.
Swingle W. T., Webber H. J., Batchelor L. D. The botany of citrus and its wild relatives of the orange family. The Citrus Industry. 1943. I: Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. California Press. p. 129-474.
Tanaka T. Complication of citrus nomenclature; species problem in citrus. 1954. Hort. Inst. Tokyo Agr. Univ. Tech. Paper No. 10.
Tanaka T. Taxonomic problem of citrus fruits in the Orient. Bull. Univ. Osaka Pref., Ser. B. 1969a. 21:133-38.
Tanaka T. Misunderstanding with regards to citrus classification and nomenclature. Bull. Univ. Osaka Pref., Ser. B. 1969b. 21:139-45.
Tolkowsky S. Hesperides. A history of culture and use of citrus fruits. 1938. London: John Bale, Sons and Curnow, Ltd.
Toxopeus H. Notes on the genetics of a few leaf characters in the genus Citrus. Euphytica. 1962. 11:19-25. DOI: 10.1007/BF00044800 [CrossRef]
Webber H. J., Reuther W., Lawton H. W., Reuther W., Webber H. J., Batchelor L. D. History and development of the citrus industry. The Citrus Industry. 1967. I Berkeley: Univ. California Press. p. 1-39.