Hilgardia
Hilgardia
Hilgardia
University of California
Hilgardia

An economic model for selecting Douglas-fir reforestation projects

Authors

Joseph Buongiorno
Dennis E. Teeguarden

Authors Affiliations

Joseph Buongiorno was formerly Research Assistant, School of Forestry and Conservation, Berkeley, is now Forest Economist, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy; Dennis E. Teeguarden was Professor of Forestry in the School of Forestry and Conservation, Forester in the Agricultural Experiment Station, and Associate Economist of the Giannini Foundation, Berkeley.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 42(3):35-120. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v42n03p035. July 1973.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

This study presents an economic model for designing and selecting an optimal reforestation program. Given an initial set of resource and policy constraints, the model permits the user to select simultaneously the best set of reforestation projects to execute, the method of reforestation to employ, and the best initial stocking in new plantations. The model was developed for use by managers of large-scale, public land reforestation programs in the Douglas-fir Region of the Western United States.

Results of the study include a package of linked computer programs which provides a completely automated procedure for designing and selecting a reforestation program. The programs have the following functions:

The first program, FOREST, simulates a regime of harvests in plantations consistent with the goal of maximizing present net worth subject to specified constraints. It also generates a set of production functions which describe in terms of present net worth per acre the relationship between number of trees at age ten years and the cost of obtaining that number of trees.

The second program, REGEN II, first calculates the present net worth per acre of alternative reforestation techniques (hand planting, aerial seeding, and natural regeneration) which can be applied to a particular tract of land. Then the same program uses a linear programming model to select the set of tracts, techniques, and initial stocking density which maximizes the present net worth of the whole reforestation program within a set of multiple constraints imposed by available projects, budget, seeds, and seedlings.

A third program, FINAL, lists all projects recommended for reforestation in the current year, method of treatment, seeding density or initial spacing in plantations scheduled for hand planting, and resource requirements.

Literature Cited

Published Materials

Amidon E. L., Akin G. S. Dynamic programming to determine optimum levels of growing stock. Forest Science. 1968. 14(3):287-291.

Assman Ernst. Density of stocking and wood production. Management 26 Trans, from Forstmiss Centrbl. 1953. 72 Washington, D.C.: U. S. Forest Service. p. 69-101.

Baumol William J. Economic theory and operations analysis. 1965. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Chappelle Daniel E., Nelson Thomas C. Estimation of optimum stocking levels and rotation ages of Loblolly Pine. Forest Science. 1964. 10(4):471-502.

Chislom Anthony H. Criteria for determining the optimum replacement pattern. J. Farm Econ. 1965. 48(1):107-112. DOI: 10.2307/1236182 [CrossRef]

Curtis Robert O. A method of estimation of gross yield of Douglas-fir 1967. Forest Science Monograph 13. Soc. of Amer. Foresters, Washington D.C

Dantzig George B. Linear programming and extensions. 1963. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press.

Duerr William A. Fundamentals of forestry economics. 1960. New York: McGraw Hill.

Duff G. Yield of unthinned Douglas-fir, Corsicom pine, and Ponderosa pine in New Zealand. 1956. Wellington: New Zealand Forest Service. Forest Res. Note 5

Eckstein Otto. Water resources development. 1958. Harvard Univ. Press.

Fedkiw John. Planning forest resource management in U.S.D.A. J. Forestry. 1968. 66(10):768-773.

Fisher Irving. The theory of interest. 1954. New York: Kelly and Millman.

Hirshleifer Jack. On the theory of optimal investment decision. J. Political Economy. 1958. 66:329-352. DOI: 10.1086/258057 [CrossRef]

Hoyer Gerald E. Optimum thinning intensity tables 1966. DNR Report No. 7. Washington Dept. of Natural Resources. Olympia

International Business Machines. Linear and separable programming user’s manual 1968. H20-0476 360/OS MPS/360 (360-CO-14X)

Ker John W., Harry J., Smith G. Advantages of the parabolic expression of height-diameter relationship. Forestry Chronicle. 1955. 31(3):236-246.

Little I. M. D., Mirrlees J. A. Manual of industrial project analysis in developing countries. 1968. 2: Paris: Social Cost-Benefit Analysis O.C.D.E.

McArdle Richard E., Meyer Walter H., Bruce Donald. The yield of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest 1961. Washington, D.C. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. 201

McClay T. A. Economic considerations in Douglas-fir stand establishment. 1955. U. S. Forest Service. Research Paper 15. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon

Möller Carl M. The influence of thinning on volume increment. Thinnings Problems and Practices in Denmark. Tech. Bull No. 76. 1954. Syracuse, New York: New York State College of Forestry at Syracuse Univ.

Naslund Bertil. Optimal rotation and thinning. Forest Science. 1969. 15(4):446-451.

Newnham R. M. The development of a stand model for Douglas-fir 1964. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver

Reukema Donald L. Forty-year development of Douglas-fir stands planted at various spacings. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper 100. 1970. Portland, Ore: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.

Samuelson P. A. Economics, an introductory analysis. 1964. Sixth edition New York: McGraw Hill.

Smith J. H. G., Ker J. W., Czimzmazia J. Economics of reforestation of Douglas-fir, Western Hemlock and Western Red Cedar in the Vancouver forest district. 1961. Vancouver: Univ. of British Columbia. 144p. Forestry Bulletin No. 3

Spurr Stephen H. A measure of point density. Forest Science. 1962. 8(1):85-96.

Staebler George R. Theoretical derivation of numerical thinning schedules for Douglas-fir. Forest Science. 1960. 6(2):98-109.

Teeguarden Dennis E. Economic criteria and calculated risk in reforestation investment decisions. J. Forestry. 1969. 67(1):25-31.

Teeguarden Dennis E., Von Sperber H. S. Scheduling Douglas-fir reforestation investments: a comparison of methods. Forest Science. 1968. 14(4):354-367.

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Timber trends in Western Oregon and Western Washington 1963. U.S.F.S. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper PNW 5. Portland, Oregon

U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Manual 1602, basic guidance 1968. Washington, D.C

Weingartner H. M. Capital budgeting of interrelated projects, survey and synthesis. Management Science. 1966. 12(7):485-516. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.12.7.485 [CrossRef]

Yohe William P., Karnosky Denis S. Interest rates and prices level changes, 1952-1969. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Reprint Series No. 1969. 49:38

Unpublished Materials

Debreu Gerard. Lecture notes from a course given by Gerard Debreu in Linear Programming. 1970. Berkeley: Univ. of Calif.

Radner Roy. Lecture notes on the Theory of Economic Planning 1960. Athens

Radner Roy. Lecture notes from a course on National Economic Planning. 1970. Berkeley: Univ. of Calif.

U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. A new stand-model approach to determine Douglas-fir rotations in Western Oregon 1965. Unpublished paper. Portland, Oregon

Buongiorno J, Teeguarden D. 1973. An economic model for selecting Douglas-fir reforestation projects. Hilgardia 42(3):35-120. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v42n03p035
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu