Worldwide survey and comparison of adult predator and scavenger insect populations
      associated with domestic animal manure where livestock is artificially congregated

Legner, E; Olton, G

Worldwide survey and comparison of adult predator and scavenger insect populations associated with domestic animal manure where livestock is artificially congregated

Authors

E. F. Legner
G. S. Olton

Authors Affiliations

E. F. Legner was Associate Professor, Division of Biological Control, Department of Entomology, Citrus Research Center, and Associate Entomologist in the Experiment Station, Riverside; G. S. Olton was Research Assistant, Division of Biological Control, Department of Entomology, Citrus Research Center, and the Experiment Station, Riverside.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 40(9):225-266. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v40n09p225. August 1970.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Predatory and scavenger insect fauna found associated with developmental stages of muscoid Diptera breeding in the domestic animal manure that accumulates in dairies, poultry houses, and the like, are identified and their frequency and distribution compared for the summer and winter seasons of the major climatic areas in the southwestern United States. Insects were also identified under somewhat more limited conditions in the Neotropical, Palearctic, Ethiopian, and Australian regions. The Holarctic and Australian collections were similar, although the latter lacked many species. Collections made in the Ethiopian and Neotropical regions were not similar. Further search in these latter two regions might uncover additional predatory species for introduction elsewhere. Climatic similarity between the area of origin and release elsewhere appears to be indicated for successful establishment of any new species. The principal predators were found in the insect families Labiduridae, Histeridae, and Staphylinidae, although other families predominated in certain areas. Although only two California predators, Philonthus longicornis Stephens and P. rectangulus Sharp, were common in both the Ethiopian and Neotropical regions, the California and the Neotropical regions had nine species in common. The distribution of scavengers was similar. Principal predators noted for their wide distribution and high relative abundance were Carcinops pumilio Erichson, C. troglodytes Erichson, Gnathoncus nanus Scriba, Philonthus sordidus (Gravenhorst), P. rectangulus and Euborellia annulipes (Lucas). Principal scavenger species were Alphitohius diaperinus (Panzer) and Aphodius lividus (Olivier). The fauna in cattle droppings in the field was sparse, but the species found were similar to those in the accumulated manure.

Literature Cited

Abbott C. E. The necrophilous habits in Coleoptera. Bull. Brooklyn Ent. Soc. 1937. 32:202-04.

Abbott C. E. The development and general biology of Creophilus villosus Grav. Jour. New York Ent. Soc. 1938. 46(1):49-52.

Anderson J. R., Poorbaugh J. K. Biological control possibility for houseflies. Calif. Agr. 1964. 18(9):2-4. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v018n09p2 [CrossRef]

Axtell R. C. Macrochelidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) inhabiting manure and their effect on housefly production 1962. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.

Axtell R. C. Effect of Macrochelidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) on housefly production from dairy cattle manure. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1963a. 56(3):317-21.

Axtell R. C. Acarina occurring in domestic animal manure. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amor. 1963b. 56(5):628-33.

Axtell R. C. Integrated housefly control: populations of fly larvae and predaceous mites, Macrocheles muscaedomesticae, in poultry manure after larvicide treatment. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1968. 61(1):245-49.

Balduf W. V. The bionomics of entomophagous Coleoptera. 1935. St. Louis, Missouri: John S. Swift &; Co. 220p.

Blatchley W. S. Coleoptera or beetles known to occur in Indiana. Indiana Dept. Geol. &; Nat. Res. Bul. 1910. 1:1,385

Brown Y. W. Notes on the American distribution of some species of Coleoptera common to the European and North American continents. Can. Ent. 1940. 72:65-78. DOI: 10.4039/Ent7265-4 [CrossRef]

Brues C. T. Insect dietary—an account of the food habits of insects. 1946. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press. 466p.

Clark C. U. On the food habits of certain dung and carrion beetles. Jour. New York Ent. Soc. 1895. 3:61

Clausen C. P. Entomophagous insects. 1962. New York: Hafner Publ. Co. 688p.

Davis W. T. Silpha surinamensis and Creophilus villosus as predaceous insects. Jour. New York Ent. Soc. 1915. 23(2):150-51.

Errington P. L. Predation and vertebrate populations. Quart. Rev. Biol. 1946. 21:144-77. 221-45. DOI: 10.1086/395220 [CrossRef]

Errington P. L. Muskrat populations. 1963. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press. 665p.

Evans M. E. G. A comparative account of feeding methods of the beetles Nebria brevicollis (F.) (Carabidae) and Philonthus decorus (Grav.) (Staphylinidae). Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 1964. 66:9-109. DOI: 10.1017/S0080456800023395 [CrossRef]

Fichter G. S. Necrophily vs. necrophagy. Ohio Jour. Sci. 1949. 49:201-04.

Hammer O. Biological and ecological investigations on flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement. Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening. 1941. 105:257

Handschin E. Investigations on the buffalo fly (Lyperosia exigua de Meij) and its parasites in Java and northern Australia. 1932. 31: Pamph. No: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. 24p.

Hicks E. A. Check-list and bibliography on the occurrence of insects in birds’ nests. 1959. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press. 681p.

Holling C. C. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Ent. 1959. 91:293-320. DOI: 10.4039/Ent91293-5 [CrossRef]

Holling C. C. Principles of insect predation. Ann. Rev. Ent. 1961. 6:163-82. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.06.010161.001115 [CrossRef]

Huffaker C. B. Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia. 1958. 27(14):343-83. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v27n14p343 [CrossRef]

Illingworth J. F. Insect fauna of hen manure. Proc. Hawaiian Ent. Soc. 1923. 5:270-73.

Landin B. O. Ecological studies on dung beetles. Opuscula Entomologica. 1961. XIX(Suppl.):228

Legner E. F., Olton G. S. Activity of parasites from Diptera: Musca domestica, Stomoxys calcitrans, and species of Fannia, Muscina, and Ophyra. II. at sites in the Eastern Hemisphere and Pacific Area. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 1968a. 61(5):1306-14.

Legner E. F., Olton G. S. The biological method and integrated control of house and stable flies in California. Calif. Agr. 1968. 22(6):2-3. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v022n06p2 [CrossRef]

Legner E. F., Bay E. B., White E. C. Activity of parasites from Diptera: Musca domestica, Stomoxys calcitrans, Fannia canicular is, and F. femoralis, at sites in the Western Hemisphere. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 1967. 60(2):462-68.

Mank H. G. The biology of the Staphylinidae. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 1923. 16:220-37.

McGrath R. M., Hatch M. H. The Coleoptera of Washington: Shaeritidae and Histeridae. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 1941. 10:47-90.

Mohr C. R. Cattle droppings as ecological units. Ecol. Monogr. 1943. 13:275-98. DOI: 10.2307/1943223 [CrossRef]

Moore I. An efficient method of collecting dung beetles. Pan-Pacific Ent. 1954. 30:208

Peck J. H. The potential role of arthropod predators in the integrated control of Diptera developing in poultry droppings 1968. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Calif.: Berkeley, Calif.

Pemberton C. E. History of the Entomology Department Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters Assoc. 1904-1945. Hawaiian Planters Record. 1948. 52(1):53-90.

Phillips J. S. The biology and distribution of ants in Hawaiian pineapple fields. Hawaii Pineapple Prod. Sta. Bul. 1934. 15:1-57.

Pimentel D. Relationship of ants to fly control in Puerto Rico. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1955. 48(1):28-30.

Poorbaugh J. H. Jr. Ecological studies on the insect community utilizing undisturbed cattle droppings 1966. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Calif.: Berkeley, Calif.

Portchinsky I. A. Muscarus cadaverinarum stercoriarumque biologia comparata. Horae Soc. Ent. Ross. 1885. 19:210-44.

Portchinsky I. A. Muscina stabulans Fallen, mouche nuisible a l’homme et à son ménage, en état larvarre destructense des larves de Musca domestica. 1913. 10:Publ. Entomol. Bureau Russian Dept. Land Admin. and Agric. 1p.

Ricker W. E. Stock and recruitment. Jour. Fisheries Res. Board Can. 1954. 11:559-623. DOI: 10.1139/f54-039 [CrossRef]

Sanders D. P., Dobson R. C. The insect complex associated with bovine manure in Indiana. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 1966. 59(5):955-59.

Schaufuss C. Calwer’s Käferbuch. 1916. 2: Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart. 390p.

Simmonds H. W. Investigations with a view to the biological control of houseflies in Fiji. Trop. Agr. 1940. 17(10):197-99.

Snowball G. J. A consideration of the insect population associated with cow dung at Crawley. W. A. Jour. Roy. Soc. W. Aust. 1941-42. 28:219-45.

Steel G. D., Torrie J. H. Principles and procedures of statistics. 1960. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. 481p.

Swezey O. H. Records of introduction of beneficial insects into the Hawaiian Islands. The Hawaiian Planters Record. 1925. 29(4):369-76.

Voris R. Biologic investigation on the Staphylinidae. Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis. 1934. 28:233-61.

Wade C. F., Rodriguez J. G. Life history of Macrocheles muscae-domesticae (Acarina: Macrochelidae) in relation to its predatory action on the housefly egg. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 1961. 54(6):776-81.

Willis R. R., Axtell R. C. Mite predators of the housefly: a comparison of Fuscuropoda vegetans and Macrocheles muscaedomesticae. Jour. Econ. Ent. 1968. 61(6):1669-74.

Xambeau P. Moeurs et metamorphoses-Philonthus. Le Naturaliste. Paris. 1907. 29:115-17. 144-46.

Also in this issue:

Our knowledge of the Pacific Rim is inadequate

Fostering lambs by odor transfer

Plant spikes for commercial nurseries

Horn fly resistance to pyrethroids

Uniformity of continuous-move sprinkler machines

Potassium deficiency syndrome of cotton

Influence of phosphorus and nitrogen on celery

Lures and traps for monitoring tomato fruitworm

Using DRIS to assay nutrients in subclover

Selection of the common green lacewing for resistance to carbaryl