Temperature and plant responses to paper and plastic protectors on cantaloupes
AuthorsC. A. Shadbolt
O. D. McCoy
Authors AffiliationsC. A. Shadbolt was Assistant Olericulturist, Department of Vegetable Crops, Riverside; O. D. McCoy was Assistant Specialist, Department of Vegetable Crops, Imperial Valley Field Station, El Centro.
Hilgardia 30(9):247-266. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v30n09p247. November 1960.
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
When warm-season plants are grown during the winter months, some means of microclimatic manipulation becomes essential. This is the case in the production of cantaloupes in the desert areas of the south, vestern United States. At EI Centro in Imperial Valley, for instance, the average maximum in January of 1959 was 73.3° and the average minimum was 39.8° F. The soil temperature varies from a maximum of about 75° to a minimum of about 45° F. According to (Knott (1957)),5 the optimum temperature for cantaloupe growth is a monthly average of 90° during the day and 60° during the night. The optimum soil germination temperature is about 90° F. It is obvious, then, that conditions existing in this area during January are far from ideal for the germination and growth of cantaloupe plants.
In contrast to the use of plant protectors in many other areas of the country, those used during the winter season in the desert areas of California remain in place for as long as three months. Cantaloupes planted during December remain under the protection of the shelters for nearly half of their life span. Any device employed under such conditions must meet certain requirements in order to be of value. Conditions should be such that rapid growth occurs and vigorous and hardy plants are produced. Environmental modifications which would create conditions for the plants more ideal than those naturally occurring would be: increased daytime air temperature, but not in excess; maximum increase in nighttime air temperature, hence protection from frost; increase in soil temperature; and maintenance of relative humidity at moderate levels. In addition to the conditions which relate directly to plant growth, shelters must also provide protection from wind and blowing sand.
Hart S. A., Zink F. W. Brushing and brushing materials for frost protection. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1957. 69:475-79.
Johnson C. M., Ulrich Albert. Determination of nitrate in plant material. Anal. Chem. 1950. 22:1526-29. DOI: 10.1021/ac60048a018 [CrossRef]
Knott J. E. Handbook for vegetable growers. 1957. New York: John Wiley &; Sons, Inc. 7p. Pages 8.
Raleigh G. J. The effect of culture solution temperature on the water uptake and wilting of the muskmelon. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1941. 38:487-88.
Schroeder R. A. The effect of root temperature upon the absorption of water by the cucumber. Mo. Ag. Expt. Sta. Res. Bul. 1939. 309:
Waggoner Paul E. Protecting plants from the cold. The principles and benefits of plastic shelters. Conn. Ag. Expt. Sta. Bul. 1958. 614:
Also in this issue:An indispensable partnership
Leafhoppers transmit citrus stubborn disease to weed host
Fusarium-resistant watermelon cultivars
Using cannery wastes on forage cropland
High density apple orchards offer many advantages
Cultural practices affect alfalfa soil temperatures
Triticale shows little potential for central valleys
Leached manure—a promising soil anti-chustant
Wastewater regulations in santa ana river basin
Immunity to virus infection
Community data bank