Hilgardia
Hilgardia
Hilgardia
University of California
Hilgardia

The enzymes of Pythiacystis citrophthora Sm. and Sm.

Author

L. Joseph Klotz

Author Affiliations

L. Joseph Klotz was Research Associate in Plant Pathology and National Research Fellow in the Biological Sciences.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 3(2):27-40. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v03n02p027. October 1927.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Abstract does not appear. First page follows.

I. Introduction

This paper reports a study of the enzymes produced by the fungus, Pythiaeystis citrophthora, when grown in pure culture. For references and short general reviews of the several works on the enzymes of the various groups of fungi, see Waksman,(25) Waksman and Davison,(26) Dox,(6) Zeller(27) and Cooley.(5) Considering forms morphologically rather near to Pythiacystis, Emoto(7) found in species of Saprolegnia that amylase, inulase, raffinase, invertase, lactase, maltase, emulsin, salicase, glycolase, proteolytic enzymes (acid, neutral, alkaline), peroxidase and catalase were present as intra-cellular enzymes, and pectinase, cellulase, lipase, urease, tyrosinase and oxidase were absent. In the Achlya, amylase, inulase, cellulase, invertase, lactase, maltase, emulsin, salicase, proteolytic enzymes (acid, neutral, alkaline) peroxidase, and catalase were present and pectinase, glycolase, lipase, urease, tyrosinase and oxidase absent.

Among the enzymes reported by various workers as being produced by representatives of the Mucorales are cytase, cellobiase, pectinase, inulase, diastase, maltase, invertase, lactase, zymase, rennet and lipase. This briefly sums up the known work on the enzymes produced by the phycomycetous fungi.

Literature Cited

[1] Albert R., Buchner E., Rapp R. Herstellung von Dauer-Hefe mittels Aceton. Ber. deut. chem. Gesell. 1902. 35:2376-2382. DOI: 10.1002/cber.190203502214 [CrossRef]

[2] Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Official and tentative methods of analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 1921. p.417. 18 f. Washington

[3] Bloor W. R. A method for the determination of fat in small amounts in blood. Jour. Biol. Chem. 1914. 17:377-384.

[4] Clark W. M. The determination of hydrozen ions 1923. p.480. f. 1-42. Baltimore DOI: 10.1097/00000441-192901000-00018 [CrossRef]

[5] Cooley J. S. A study of the physiological relations of Sclerotinia cinerea (Bon.) Schroter. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1914. 1:291-326. DOI: 10.2307/2990078 [CrossRef]

[6] Dox A. W. The intracellular enzymes of Penicillium and Aspergillus. TL S. Dept. Agr. Bur. An. Ind. Bul. 1910. 120:1-70.

[7] Emoto Y. Ueber die Enzyme einiger Saprolegnieen. Bot. Mag. Tokyo. 1923. 37(13):29 pl. 1. (See Bot. Abs. 12: 871. 1923.)

[8] Fawcett Howard S. Two fungi as causal agents in gummosis of lemon trees in California. Calif. Comm. Hort. Mo. Bul. 1913. 2:601-617. 12 f; Phytopathology 3: 194-195

[9] Fawcett Howard S. Gummosis of citrus. Jour. Agr. Res. 1923. 24:191-236. 8 pls.

[10] Gortner R. A., Holm G. E. On the origin of the humin formed by the acid hydrolysis of protein. II. Hydrolysis in the presence of aldehydes. III. Hydrolysis in the presence of formaldehyde. Am. Chem. Soc. Jour. 1917. 39:2477-2501. DOI: 10.1021/ja02256a028 [CrossRef]

[11] Harvey E. H. Efficiency of some common anti-ferments. Amer. Jour. Pharm. 1922. 94:797-801.

[12] Harvey E. H. Ibid. 1923. 95:105-108.

[13] Jean F. Die Bestimmung des Tannins und der Gallussäure. Ann. Chim. Anal. Appl. 1900. 5:134-140. [Chem. Centralbl. 1900: 1107-1108.]

[14] Kohnstamm P. Amylolytische, glycosidspaltende, proteolytische und cellulose lösende fermente in holzbewohnen den Pilzen. Bot. Centralbl. Beih. 1901. 10:90-121.

[15] McBeth I. G., Scales F. M. The destruction of cellulose by bacteria and filamentous fungi. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bul. 1913. 266:1-52. pl. 1-4

[16] Onslow Muriel Wheldale. Practical plant biochemistry 1923. p.194. Cambridge DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.22253 [CrossRef]

[17] Pringsheim H., Kohn G. Zur kenntnis des inulins und der inulase. IV. Zeitschr. Physiol. Chem. 1924. 133:80-96. DOI: 10.1515/bchm2.1924.133.1-4.80 [CrossRef]

[18] Reed H. S. The enzyme activities involved in certain fruit diseases. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept. 1913. 1911-1913:51-77.

[19] Rice F. E., Markley A. L. Proof of the presence of lipase in milk and a new method for the detection of the enzyme. Jour. Dairy Sci. 1922. 5:64-82. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(22)94134-7 [CrossRef]

[20] Shaffer P. A., Hartmann A. F. The iodometric determination of copper and its use in sugar analysis. II. Methods for the determinations of reducing sugars in blood, urine, milk, and other solutions. Jour. Biol. Chem. 1921. 45:365-390.

[21] Smith R. E. A new apparatus for aseptic ultrafiltration. Phytopath. 1917. 7:290-294.

[22] Smith R. E., Smith E. H. A new fungus of economic importance. Bot. Gaz. 1906. 42:215-221. DOI: 10.1086/328962 [CrossRef]

[23] Van Rijn J. J. L. Die glycoside 1900. Berlin

[24] Van Slyke D. D. Note on the micro-method for gasometric determination of aliphatic amino nitrogen. Jour. Biol. Chem. 1915. 23:407-409. 1 f.

[25] Waksman S. A. Bibliographic review. Enzymes of microorganisms. Abs. Bact. 1922. 6:265-299. 331-360.

[26] Waksman S. A., Davison W. D. Enzymes 1926. p.364. 11 figs. Baltimore DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192701000-00008 [CrossRef]

[27] Zeller S. M. Studies in the physiology of the fungi. II. Lenzites saepiaria Fries, with species reference to enzyme activity. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1916. 3:439-512. pl. 8-9 DOI: 10.2307/2990090 [CrossRef]

Klotz L. 1927. The enzymes of Pythiacystis citrophthora Sm. and Sm.. Hilgardia 3(2):27-40. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v03n02p027
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu