Some factors affecting the irrigation requirements of deciduous orchards
AuthorFrank J. Veihmeyer
Author AffiliationsFrank J. Veihmeyer was Assistant Professor of Irrigation Investigations and Practice, Associate Irrigation Engineer in Experiment Station.
Hilgardia 2(6):125-291. DOI:10.3733/hilg.v02n06p125. January 1927.
Abstract does not appear. First page follows.
The relation of water to plant growth is of especial interest to growers of deciduous fruits. Consideration of the relative losses of moisture from irrigated soils by evaporation or transpiration through plants and by means of surface evaporation from the soil is becoming increasingly important. This is especially true in many of the deciduous fruit areas of California, where the cost of irrigation is one of the main items of expense in orchard management. The orchardist growing fruit in an arid or semi-arid region, where irrigation is necessary, supposedly has an advantage over the grower of similar fruit in a humid area, because the supply of moisture in the soil can be controlled to a greater extent. Therefore, it is important to consider the effect of different degrees of soil moisture on the use of water by trees, and the effect of such differences on the kind of fruit produced.
A portion of the California deciduous fruit orchards have been planted in localities where dependence has been placed upon rainfall only. However that irrigation is necessary in many sections of California for the best production of horticultural crops is a fact now coming into recognition.
 Alway F. V. Studies on the relation of the non-available water of the soil to the hydroscopic coefficient. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Research Bul. 1913. 3:1-121.
 Alway F. V. Some studies in the dry land regions. U. S. Dept Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bul. 1918. 130:1-212.
 Alway F. V., McDole G. R. Relation of movement of water in a soil to its hygroscopicity and initial moistness. Jour. Agr. Res. 1917. 10:391-428. DOI: 10.2307/2255723 [CrossRef]
 Baker P. B. The moisture content of field soils under different treatments. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta., 35th Ann. Rept. 1912. 1911:106-111.
 Batchelor L. D., Reed H. S. Winter drying or die-back of the walnut. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 1919. 216:1-20.
 Batchelor L. D., Reed H. S. The seasonal variation of the soil moisture in a walnut grove in relation to the hygroscopic coefficient. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Paper. 1923. 10:1-31.
 Bouyoucos G. J. Effect of temperature on movement of water vapor and capillary moisture in soils. Jour. Agr. Res. 1915. 8:141-172.
 Bouyoucos G. J. Relation between the unfree water and the heat of wetting of soils and its significance. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 1918. 42:1-21.
 Bouyoucos G. J. A new classification of soil moisture. Soil Sci. 1921. 11:33-47. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192101000-00002 [CrossRef]
 Bouyoucos G. J., McCool M. M. The aeration of soils as influenced by air-barometric pressure changes. Soil Sci. 1924. 18:52-63. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192407000-00004 [CrossRef]
 Briggs L. J. The mechanics of soil moisture. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Soils, Bul. 1897. 10:1-24. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.43273 [CrossRef]
 Briggs L. J., Shantz H. L. The wilting coefficient for different plants and its indirect determination. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bul. 1912. 230:1-83. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.64958 [CrossRef]
 Briggs L. J., Shantz H. L. Relative water requirements of plants. Jour. Agr. Res. 1914. 3:1-63.
 Briggs L. J., Shantz H. L. Comparison of the hourly evaporation rate of atmometers and free water surfaces with the transpiration rate of Medicago sativa. Jour. Agr. Res. 1917. 9:277-292.
 Briggs L. J., Jensen C. A., McLane J. W. The mulched-basin system of irrigated citrus culture and its bearing on the control of mottle-leaf. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bul. 1917. 499:1-32.
 Burr W. W. The storage and use of soil moisture. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta., Research Bul. 1914. 5:1-88.
 Buckingham E. Studies on the movement of soil moisture. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Soils Bul. 1907. 38:1-61.
 Caldwell J. R. The relation of environmental factors to the phenomena of permanent wilting. Physiological Researches. 1913. 1:1-56.
 Call L. E., Sewell M. C. The soil mulch. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron. 1917. 9:49-61.
 Cameron F. K. The soil solution. 1911. Easton, Pa.: Chemical Pub. Co. p. 1-136. DOI: 10.1021/j150154a001 [CrossRef]
 Chilcott E. C., Cole J. S. Subsoiling, deep tilling, and soil dynamiting in the Great Plains. Jour. Agr. Res. 1918. 14:481-521.
 Copeland E. B. A new self-registering transpiration machine. Bot. Gaz. 1898. 26:343-348. DOI: 10.1086/327759 [CrossRef]
 Corbett L. C. An improved auxanometer and some of its uses 1898. pp.40-42. West Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta., 12th Ann. Rept.
 Curtis O. F. Studies on the tissues concerned in the transfer of solutes in plants. Ann. Bot. 1925. 39:573-585.
 Denny F. E. Formulas for calculating number of fruits required for adequate sample for analysis. Bot. Gaz. 1922. 73:44-57. DOI: 10.1086/332958 [CrossRef]
 Fortier S., Beckett S. H. Evaporation from irrigated soils. U. S. Dept. Agr., Off. Exp. Sta., Bul. 1912. 248:1-77.
 Fowler L. W., Lipman C. B. Optimum moisture conditions for young lemon trees on a loam soil. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agr. Sci. 1917. 3:25-36.
 Gardner W. Capillary moisture holding capacity. Soil Sci. 1919. 7:319-324. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-191904000-00009 [CrossRef]
 Hall A. D. The soil. 1910. New York: E. P. Dutton and Co. p. 1-311.
 Harris F. S., Turpin H. W. Movement and distribution of moisture in soil. Jour. Agr. Res. 1917. 10:113-153. DOI: 10.2307/2255722 [CrossRef]
 Hilgard E. W., Loughridge R. H. Endurance of drought in soils of the arid regions 1897. pp.40-64. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Rept., 1897-1898
 Hoff E. J. Sensitive water-level recorder. Engin. News. 1916. 76:974-975.
 Hoagland D. R. Physiological aspects of soil solution investigations. Hilgardia. 1925. 1:228-257. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v01n11p227 [CrossRef]
 Israelsen O. W., West F. L. Water holding capacity of irrigated soils. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 1922. 183:1-24.
 Joseph A. F., Martin F. J. The moisture equivalent of heavy soils. Jour. Agr. Sci. 1923. 13:49-57. DOI: 10.1017/S002185960000321X [CrossRef]
 Kiesselbach T. A. Transpiration as a factor in crop production. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1915. 6:1-214.
 King F. H. Soil management. 1914. New York: Orange Judd Company. p. 1-303. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900040033x [CrossRef]
 Livingston B. E., Koketsu . The water supplying power of the soil as related to the wilting of plants. Soil Sci. 1920. 9:469-485. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192006000-00004 [CrossRef]
 Loughridge R. H. Distribution of water in the soil in furrow irrigation. U. S. Dept. Agr., Off. Exp. Sta., Bul. 1908. 203:1-63.
 McLaughlin W. W. Capillary movement of soil moisture. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 1920. 835:1-69. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.34006 [CrossRef]
 Miller E. C. Comparative study of root systems and leaf area of corn and sorghums. Jour. Agr. Res. 1916. 6:311-331.
 Parker F. W. The classification of soil moisture. Soil Sci. 1922. 13:43-54. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192201000-00004 [CrossRef]
 Puri A. N. A critical study of the hygroscopic coefficient of soils. Soil Sci. 1925. 15:272-283. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600006729 [CrossRef]
 Rotmistrov V. G. Sushshnost Zasukhi po Dannym Odesskago Opytnago Polia Odessa, Russia 1913. Russion ed.pp.1-66. 1911 (English translation.) The nature of drought according to the evidence of the Odessa Experiment Station. Sta. M. of L. and A., Dept. of Agr., Odessa.
 Sewell M. C. Tillage: A review of the literature. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron. 1919. 11:269-290.
 Sleight R. B. Evaporation from the surfaces of water and river-bed materials. Jour. Agr. Res. 1917. 10:209-261.
 Shive J. W., Livingston B. E. The relation of atmospheric evaporating power to soil-moisture content at permanent wilting of plants. Plant World. 1914. 17:81-121.
 Shull C. A. Measurement of the surface forces in soils. Bot. Gaz. 1916. 62:1-29. DOI: 10.1086/331850 [CrossRef]
 Thomas M. D. Aqueous vapor pressure of soils. Soil Sci. 1921. 11:409-434. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-192401000-00001 [CrossRef]
 Tufts W. P. Pruning of young deciduous fruit trees. California Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 1919. 313:1-37. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.59194 [CrossRef]
 Veihmeyer F. J., Israelsen O. W., Conrad J. P. The moisture equivalent as influenced by the amount of soil used in its determination. California Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Paper. 1924. 16:1-62.
 Weaver J. E., Jean F. C., Crist J. W. Development and activities of roots of crop plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Pub. 1922. 316:1-117.
 Widtsoe J. A. Principles of irrigation practice. 1914. New York: The MacMillan Company. p. 1-496. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.26958 [CrossRef]
 Willard R. E., Humbert E. P. Soil moisture. New Mexico Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1914. 86:1-86. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511898082.006 [CrossRef]
 Young H. J. Soil mulch. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Rept. 1911. p.124. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-003-0639-9 [CrossRef]
Also in this issue:California Clingstone peaches: Economic status, 1948
Effect of potash on oranges: Studies on deficiency and excess in relation to tree growth, composition and fruit quality
Studies on dehydration of figs: Reduction in yeast count achieved is considered advantage for this type of drying
Low volume spraying: Of deciduous fruit trees successful with air carrier speed sprayers
Irrigation practices: Efficiency of different systems determined by various factors
Avocado root rot: Two-phase series of experiments to determine control methods
Suggestions for vineyard fertiliization: Test plots recommended to determine most efficient fertilization proggram
Black-end of pear: Problem is subject of extensive field and laboratory studies
Two new table-wine grapes: Promising in combining high productivity and wine quality
Citrus red mite: New chemical gives promising results in control experiments
PE in poultry: Variety of factors found to affect control of avian pneumoencephalitis
Sweet root orange trees: Symptomless hosts of the quick decline virus