Hilgardia
Hilgardia
Hilgardia
University of California
Hilgardia

Methyl bromide alternatives evaluated for California strawberry nurseries

Authors

Steven A. Fennimore
John M. Duniway
Greg T. Browne
Frank N. Martin
Husein A. Ajwa
Becky B. Westerdahl
Rachael E. Goodhue
Milton Haar
Christopher Winterbottom

Authors Affiliations

S.A. Fennimore is Associate Extension Specialist, Department of Plant Sciences, UC Davis; J.M. Duniway is Professor Emeritus, Department of Plant Pathology, UC Davis; G.T. Browne is Research Plant Pathologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Davis, Calif; F.N. Martin is Research Plant Pathologist, USDA, Salinas, Calif; H.A. Ajwa is Associate Extension Specialist, Department of Plant Sciences, UC Davis; B.B. Westerdahl is Professor and Extension Specialist, Department of Nematology, UC Davis; R.E. Goodhue is Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, UC Davis; M. Haar is Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota, Lamberton; C. Winterbottom is Agronomist, Sierra Cascade Nursery, Susanville, Calif.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 62(2):62-67. DOI:10.3733/ca.v062n02p62. April 2008.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

The recent phase-out of the soil fumigant methyl bromide (MB) due to its impact on stratospheric ozone presents a huge challenge to strawberry nursery producers. We evaluated the effectiveness of alternative fumigants on soil pests and plant productivity, as well as production costs in California strawberry nurseries. Our trials followed nursery stock through low- and high-elevation phases of runnerplant propagation and a complete cycle of fruit production in coastal fields. Plant yields from the nurseries and fruit yields from Oxnard and Watsonville indicated that nursery plots treated with iodomethane plus chloropicrin, with 1,3-dichloropropene followed by dazomet, and with chloropicrin followed by dazomet produced runner-plant yields that were similar to methyl bromide plus chloropicrin. However, our economic analysis suggests that nursery profitability may nonetheless suffer from the loss of methyl bromide.

References

Carpenter J, Gianessi L, Lynch L. Economic impact of the scheduled U.S. phase-out of methyl bromide. 2000. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Washington, DC. www.ncfap.org/reports/pesticides/methyl%20bromide/methylbromide.htm .

Carpenter J, Lynch L, Trout T. Township limits on 1,3-D will impact adjustments to methyl bromide phase-out. Cal Ag. 2001. 55(3):12-8.

[CDFA] California Department of Food and Agriculture. Summary of California Laws and Regulations Pertaining to Nursery Stock. 2001. Sacramento, CA: www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/PE/Nursery/pdfs/nipm_11_insp_movmt_of_trees.pdf .

[CSC] California Strawberry Commission. Crop profile of strawberries in California. 1999. Davis, CA: National Pesticide Assessment Program. http://pestdata.ncsu.edu/cropprofiles/docs/castrawberries.html .

[DPR] California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Summary of pesticide use report data 2005: Indexed by chemical. 2006. Sacramento, CA: www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur04rep/comrpt04.pdf (accessed Oct. 5, 2007).

EXTOXNET. Extension Toxicology Network. 2001. Pesticide information profile – chloropicrin. http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/chloropi.htm (accessed Oct. 6, 2007).

Goodhue RE, Fennimore SA, Ajwa HA. The economic importance of methyl bromide: Does the California strawberry industry qualify for a critical use exemption from the methyl bromide ban?. Rev Ag Econ. 2005. 27:198-211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2005.00221.x https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2005.00221.x

Hartz TK, DeVay JE, Elmore CL. Solarization is an effective soil disinfestation technique for strawberry production. HortScience. 1993. 28:104-6.

Himelrick DG, Dozier WA Jr. Soil fumigation and soil solarization in strawberry production. Adv Straw Prod. 1991. 10:12-28.

Hokanson SC, Finn CF. Strawberry cultivar use in North America. HortTechnol. 2000. 10:94-106.

Kabir Z, Fennimore SA, Duniway JM, et al. Alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry runner plant production. HortScience. 2005. 40:1709-15.

Larson KD, Shaw DV. Soil fumigation and runner plant production: A synthesis of four years of strawberry nursery field experiments. HortScience. 2000. 35:642-6.

Martin FN. Development of alternative strategies for management of soilborne pathogens currently controlled with methyl bromide. Ann Rev Phytopathol. 2003. 41:325-50. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095514 https://doi.org/doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095514

Osteen C, Caswell M. Facing the phase-out of methyl bromide. USDA Economic Research Service. Ag Outlook A60-263. 1999. 24-7.

Shaw DV, Larson KD. A meta-analysis of strawberry yield response to preplant soil fumigation with combinations of methyl bromide-chloropicrin and four alternative systems. HortScience. 1999. 34(5):839-45.

[USDA ERS] US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Economic implications of the methyl bromide phase-out. 2000. Ag Info Bull No 756.

[US EPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Time-limited registration of iodomethane (methyl iodide). www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/iodomethane_fs.htm#content (accessed Oct. 5, 2007).

Voth V. The effect of nursery location latitude on California winter planted strawberries. Acta Hort. 1989. 265:2883-4.

Voth V, Bringhurst RS. Culture and physiological manipulation of California strawberries. HortScience. 1990. 25:889-92.

Fennimore S, Duniway J, Browne G, Martin F, Ajwa H, Westerdahl B, Goodhue R, Haar M, Winterbottom C. 2008. Methyl bromide alternatives evaluated for California strawberry nurseries. Hilgardia 62(2):62-67. DOI:10.3733/ca.v062n02p62
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu