California cotton growers utilize integrated pest management

Brodt, S; Goodell, P; Krebill-Prather, R; Vargas, R

California cotton growers utilize integrated pest management

Authors

Sonja B. Brodt
Peter B. Goodell
Rose L. Krebill-Prather
Ron N. Vargas

Authors Affiliations

S.B. Brodt was Program Evaluation Specialist; P.B. Goodell is IPM Advisor and IPM Extension Coordinator, UC Statewide IPM Program; R.L. Krebill-Prather is Research Associate, Washington State University; R.N. Vargas is County Director and Farm Advisor, UC Cooperative Extension, Madera County. The authors thank the California Cotton Growers and Ginners Association for their support, and the UC Statewide IPM Program for their support through Smith-Lever 3(d) IPM Extension funds. Special thanks to all the participants who took the time to answer and return the survey.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 61(1):24-30. DOI:10.3733/ca.v061n01p24. January 2007.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

In 2000, the UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program (UC IPM) conducted a comprehensive survey of pest management decision-making and pest control practices of cotton growers in the 11 major cotton-producing counties of California. The results indicate progress in growers' knowledge and implementation of IPM principles and techniques, although the use of certain aspects, such as treatment thresholds for insects, often fell short of researchers' recommendations. The survey also confirmed the central role of pest control advisers (PCAs) in IPM decision-making. Although independent PCAs communicate more with growers than do PCAs who are affiliated with product suppliers, PCA affiliation did not affect most on-the-ground pest treatment actions measured by this survey. The results indicate a need to expand IPM adoption surveys to include PCAs and to develop more effective ways of measuring IPM decision-making beyond counting the techniques used or not used.

References

Brodt S, Zalom F, Krebill-Prather R, et al. Almond growers rely on pest control advisers for integrated pest management. Cal Ag. 2005. 59(4):242-8.

Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. 1978. New York: J Wiley. 344p.

Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2000. 2nd ed. New York: J Wiley. 544p.

Fernandez-Cornejo J, Jans S. Pest Management in US Agriculture. Agricultural Handbook No 717. 1999. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 84p.

[GAO] Government Accounting Office. 2001 Agricultural Pesticides: Management Improvements Needed to Further Promote Integrated Pest Management. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Research, Nutrition, and General Legislation, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate. GAO-01–815. 36 p.

Godfrey LD, Leser JF. Cotton aphid management: Status and needs. 1999. Proc Beltwide Cotton Conference Orlando, FL. 40.

Goodell PB, Montez G, Wilhoit L. Shifting patterns in insecticide use on cotton in California: 1993 to 2004. 2006. Proc Beltwide Cotton Conference San Antonio, TX.

Keeley PE, Miller JH, Kempen HM. Survey of weeds on cotton farms in the San Joaquin Valley. 1975. 27th Ann Mtg California Weed Conference Fresno, CA. 47.

Knutson A, Ruberson J. 1996. Recognizing the Good Bugs in Cotton: Field Guide to Predators, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A&M Univ. Pub B-6046. 125 p.

Ohlendorf B. 2005. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Cotton. UC ANR Pub 3444. 105 p.

Ohlendorf BLP, Rude PA, Clark JK, Flint ML, 1996. Integrated Pest Management for Cotton in the Western Region of the United States. UC ANR Pub 3305. 164 p.

[UC IPM] UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. What is IPM?. 2006. www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/IPMPROJECT/about.html .

Wilson LT, Frisbie RE, Adkission PL. Developing economic thresholds in cotton. CIPM — Integrated Pest Management on Major Agricultural Systems. 1985. New York: Wiley Intersci. p. 308-44.

Also in this issue:

The Predictive Models and Procedures Used in the Forest Stand Generator (STAG)

Taking the university to the people

Letters: January-March 2007

Expanded research to target E. coli outbreaks

Oaks: Research and outreach to prevent woodland loss

Treatments could slow spread of sudden oak death

Blue oak seedling age influences growth and mortality

Exclosure size affects young blue oak seedling growth

The Coyote Lure Operative Device revisited: A fresh look at an old idea

High spring temperatures decrease peach fruit size

Quality evaluations should not be taken for granted

California teachers support the Nutrition Competencies new nutrition instruction guidelines