Hilgardia
Hilgardia
Hilgardia
University of California
Hilgardia

Low-income consumers, though less aware of genetically modified foods, are concerned and want labels

Author

Nicelma J. King

Author Affiliations

N.J. King is Cooperative Extension Specialist, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, UC Davis. This research was carried out with the cooperation and assistance of Cooperative Extension Home Economists Gloria Brown (County Director, San Mateo-San Francisco), Gloria Espinosa-Hall, Faye Lee, Yvonne Nicholson, Barbara Turner and Estella West, in identifying and coordinating appropriate groups to participate in the focus groups. Sandra Alvarez, Dana Andrews, Pat Brown and Michele Lites also facilitated some of the groups. The author is grateful for their assistance, as well as for the time and candor of the focus group participants. Any errors of fact or interpretation are the responsibility of the author alone.

Publication Information

Hilgardia 57(3):81-85. DOI:10.3733/ca.v057n03p81. July 2003.

PDF of full article, Cite this article

Abstract

Consumer attitudes about genetically modified foods have been reported in a number of studies in recent years, but little attention has been paid to the awareness and attitudes of low-income consumers. While land-grant universities and public health departments have targeted these consumers for nutrition education, it is not clear what their attitudes are, or how the subject should be addressed in education programs such as those offered by Cooperative Extension. We conducted focus groups with low-income consumers in California during spring and summer 2002. Their awareness of genetically modified foods was low, but ethical and safety concerns were fairly high; and they wanted genetically modified foods to be labeled. Consumer and nutrition education programs targeted at low-income consumers should address emerging food technologies.

References

Brown K. Seeds of concern: Are genetically modified crops an environmental dream come true or a disaster in the making?. Sci Am. 2001. 284(4):50-7.

Fukuyama F. How to regulate science. Public Interest. 2002. 146:3-22.

Heffern R. The ethics of eating 2002. Nat Catholic Reporter (May 24) http://natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2002b/052402/052402a.htm .

[IFIC] International Food Information Council/Cogent. U.S. consumer attitudes toward food biotechnology 2002. Survey Questionnaire, 9/24/02. IFIC Backgrounder, Food Safety and Nutrition Information. www.ific.org .

IFIC/Wirthlin. More U.S. consumers see potential benefits to food biotechnology. Food Biotechnology Survey Questionnaire, 3/31/01 2001. IFIC Backgrounder, Food Safety and Nutrition Information. www.ific.org .

Noussair C, Robin S, Ruffieux B. Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read the labels?. Econ Letters. 2002. 75(1):47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00594-8

Pew/Mellman. Public sentiment about genetically modified food. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology 2001. http://pewagbiotech.org/research/gmfood/ .

Pew/Zogby. Genetically modifying food: Playing God or doing God's work?. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology 2001. http://pewagbiotech.org/research/survey7-01.pdf .

Pew/Zogby. Environmental savior or saboteur? Debating the impacts of genetic engineering. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology 2002. http://pewagbiotech.org/newsroom/releases/020402.php3 .

Shanahan J, Dietram S, Eunjung L. Attitudes about agricultural biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2001. 65(2):267-281. https://doi.org/10.1086/322201 PubMed PMID: 11420759

King N. 2003. Low-income consumers, though less aware of genetically modified foods, are concerned and want labels. Hilgardia 57(3):81-85. DOI:10.3733/ca.v057n03p81
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu