Pay method affects vineyard pruner performance
AuthorsGregory E. Billikopf
Maxwell V. Norton
Authors AffiliationsG. E. Billikopf is Area Labor Management Farm Advisor, Stanislaus County; M. V. Norton is Viticulture Farm Advisor, Merced County.
Hilgardia 46(5):12-13. DOI:10.3733/ca.v046n05p12. September 1992.
A new study indicates that vineyard pruners paid on a piece-rate basis tend to work more quickly than those paid by the hour. Pay method had little effect on pruning quality as perceived by growers, although crews paid by the hour did seem to do a slightly better job. Total pruning costs were also influenced by vine vigor and vineyard location.
Also in this issue:Food safety: a matter of fact
Effects of immigration reform not as expected: California farmers still rely on new immigrants for field labor
Whitefly invasion in Imperial Valley costs growers, workers millions in losses
Cracks in irrigated clay soil may allow some drainage
Income risk varies with what you grow, where you grow it
“Residue-free” tomatoes? Bush tomatoes show very low levels of pesticide residues
Before-and-after tests on emitters show organic fertilizers can be injected through low-volume irrigation systems
Cost comparison: engines vs. electric motors for irrigation pumping
Gophers love oak — to death
Environmental factors contribute to acorn quality: Elevation, on- or off-tree collection influence the viability of blue oak acorns
Use of saline irrigation waters and minimal leaching for crop production