Subsurface drip produced highest net return in Westlands area study
AuthorsRichard B. Smith
J. D. Oster
Authors AffiliationsRichard B. Smith isa Senior Agronomist at Boyle Engineering Corporation, Fresno; J. D. Oster is Extension Soils and Water Specialist at UC Riverside; Claude Phene is a Research Leader at USDA-ARS, Fresno.
Hilgardia 45(2):8-10. DOI:10.3733/ca.v045n02p8. March 1991.
Cotton was produced using subsurface drip, low-energy precision application (LEPA), scheduled furrow, and conventional furrow irrigation systems in 1989. Subsurface drip irrigation produced the highest net return to the grower through increased cotton yields. Significant water conservation was achieved with both pressurized irrigation systems (subsurface drip and LEPA). However, computer aided scheduling of furrow irrigation did not result in significant water savings. Pressurized irrigation systems may offer the flexibility and control necessary to significantly limit unnecessary water additions to the shallow groundwater table.
Also in this issue:Publicly funded agricultural research: An impending crisis?
Can farmers use water more effectively?: Two on-farm demonstrations compare irrigation methods
Reducing drainwater: Furrow vs. subsurface drip irrigation
Analysis: Demonstration projects compared
South Sierra oak regeneration wak in sapling stage
How quality relates to price in California fresh peaches
Trace elements limit potential for blending San Joaquin drainwater with canal water
Low-input technology proves viable for limited-resource farmers in Salinas Valley
Treatment of destructive elm leaf beetle should be timed by temperature
To control mealybugs, stop honeydew-seeking ants
If registered, fungicide could reduce cavity spot of carrots
Phylloxera on rise…: Deadly insect pest poses increased risk to north coast vineyards
The effects of different pasture and rangeland ecosystems on the annual dynamics of insects in cattle droppings