Wildland value survey shows agreement on fire protection priority
AuthorsL. S. Davis
Ann De Bano
Authors AffiliationsLawrence S. Davis is Assistant Specialists in Forestry, University of California, Berkeley; Ann DeBano is Assistant Specialists in Forestry, University of California, Berkeley.
Hilgardia 16(10):8-10. DOI:10.3733/ca.v016n10p8. October 1962.
A remarkably high degree of agreement exists among public agency land managers and private landowners on the subjects of relative valuation of wildlands and relative priority of wildland fire protection, according to a recent survey. The non-market values of recreation, watershed, and hunting were clearly considered of importance on all classes of land. In many cases these non-market values were rated as more important than known or measurable values. Both timber and grazing interests agreed on the relative value of their activities on the different land classes. The survey revealed a full awareness of the complex structure of land value and its susceptibility to fire damage. This mutual understanding at the ground level should provide a firm basis for policy formulation affecting the wildlands of the central Sierra foothills.
Also in this issue:Pear decline research—Methods of propagating own-rooted old home and Bartlett pears to produce trees resistant to decline
Soil fumigation found essential for maximum strawberry yields in southern California
Root-soil boundary zones as seen by the electron microscope
Hot water treatment of hop rhizomes for nematode control
The Economics of farm relocation
Ropiness is milk… Psychrophilic bacteria and California milk quality
Toxicity of certain herbicides in soils
Studies on the activation of herbicides
Movement of carbon disulfide vapor in soils as affected by soil type, moisture content, and compaction