Improved leaching practices save water, reduce drainage problems
AuthorsJ. W. Biggar
D. R. Nielsen
Authors AffiliationsJ. W. Biggar is Assistant Irrigationist, Department of Irrigation, University of California, Davis; D. R. Nielsen is Assistant Professor, Department of Irrigation, University of California, Davis.
Hilgardia 16(3):5-5. DOI:10.3733/ca.v016n03p5. March 1962.
Field studies conducted at Tule Lake provide striking evidence that ponding water is not always an efficient method of leaching. In some plots, as much as 6 acre-ft. of water per foot of soil depth was applied, yet the soil salinity was not reduced below one half of the original amount present. Of the six feet of water applied, the first one-half foot was responsible for the leaching obtained.
During the winter months, 4 inches of rainfall was recorded. In this case the soil salinity was reduced by one half again, yet the quantity of water involved was 18 times less. Irrigation techniques can also be used to produce similar results. Reasons for these effects involve consideration of the structure of the soil and the variation in the pore velocity. Similar results have been found in other parts of the world. Reclamation of soils inundated by the sea in the Netherlands flood disaster of 1953 was more efficiently carried out by rainfall than by ponding.
Also in this issue:Cobalt-60 gamma-ray irradiator: Opens new doors to biological research at Davis
Watergrass control in rice
Soil aeration: —Essential for maximum plant growth
Briefs short reports on current agricultural research: Bovine emphysema studied in cattle
BRIEFS short reports on current agricultural research: Seed transmission of avocado sun-blotch
Plastic rice levees: Shown economically feasible
Improving yields in self-pollinated crops
Controlling watergrass in corn: With pre-emergence herbicides
New aqueous resinous soil stabilizers: Offer erosion control and water conservation possibilities
Effects of rootstock and environment on the composition of oranges and grapefruit